Friday, October 8, 2010

The Last Indian Superstar

There was a time when Amitabh was on a similar pedestal!  But the yuppification of his image and, dare I say, the discussion of every aspect of his life on his blog, has removed any mystique, and made his elite roots quite apparent to the public.  I disagree with the author on SRK's being a media made star.  I think it is somewhat correct, but the fact that he comes from very middle class roots and is self-made, still makes him appeal to a wide sweep.  There is a definite erosion in his pan-India appeal as his films take on a more NRI-favored flavor.  Salman on the other hand, was and always will be, a star that appeals to the same kind base as Rajni does.  With Dabangg he has solidified his upper middle class base, and if he plays his cards right he may well be the next Indian superstar.  However, these are shifting dynamics and as every star makes career choices to build on his current strength, he may win some and lose some!  Unfortunately for Big B, the version 3 (read on to see what I mean), will never have pan-India appeal.  His Coolie and Mard and Deewar days are done!

BY Lakshmi Chaudhry 

There’s a reason Rajinikanth drives his fans across multiple social strata delirious. A reason that bewildered north Indians are only beginning to figure out as they watch the Tamil hero’s films.






The media hullabaloo surrounding a new Rajinikanth movie inevitably follows the same pattern. Endhiran, aka Robot, is no different. Breathless paeans to his awesome star power? Check. Wide-eyed enumeration of his brand value and net worth? De rigeur bemusement at his balding, dark-skinned appeal? Snickering stories of adoring fans acting suitably deranged? Check, check, check. The media hype surrounding Rajinikanth is every bit as phenomenal as the man himself. Yet much of it dances around the obvious: what is the great secret of his inexplicable allure? And carefully ignores the inconvenient: Rajinikanth may well be our last true superstar.
On the cover of Rajinikanth’s sole biography, The Name is Rajinikanth, is a giant mugshot of the man sporting a blond wig and pair of enormous sunglasses. He looks, to my untutored eye, ridiculous. Yet when I show it to my maid, Mary, she squeals in delight: “Suparr! Akka, sooo suparr!” We stare at each other across a vast gulf of incomprehension, which in online discussions leads to the inevitable recriminations. Writers offer various theories—or debunk the same—to explain the mystery. Outraged admirers dare disrespectful journalists to visit Chennai to be torn limb to limb. Meanwhile, the Rajini juggernaut rolls along, impervious, unstoppable, and, as ever, inscrutable.
The reasons offered by fans for the magical mystery of Rajini-mania are sound, but for the most part unsatisfactory. Mary cites his ‘nallu swabhavam’ (good character), a reason also touted by my multinational exec brother in Chennai and the suave, young, New York-educated chef of a chi-chi restaurant. Okay, so he’s a good guy, perhaps legendarily so, but nice is nice, and it doth not a demigod make. The other favoured explanation belabours his indomitable style. Everything is cool about our Rajini, from his aerobic cigarettes to the bullet-spitting tip of his robotic forefinger. But style can only take a star so far. Just ask Mithun Chakraborty or Rajini-wannabe Vijayakanth, neither of whom ascended to the shtyle maanan’s stratospheric heights.
To unravel Rajinikanth’s tautological fabulousness, it’s perhaps best to begin at the beginning—that is, the 1950s—when the post-Independence Tamil film industry is the duopoly of two megastars, Shivaji Ganesan and MGR. The latter, a swashbuckling low-caste saviour, is the creation of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, which scripts, produces and finances movies as a highly effective form of propaganda. “MGR is the explicitly political hero and Shivaji the more lovable middle class hero. Each has his own appeal, and offers a useful contrast to the other,” says film critic Gopalan Ravindran. By the 1970s, however, industry insiders are scrambling for replacements.
Enter a young ex-bus conductor named Shivaji Rao Gaekwad, who makes an on-screen splash as a charismatic villain pitted against a rising Kamal Haasan in Apoorva Ragangal (1975). Kamal, with his histrionic repertoire and middle class background, is a cinch for the Shivaji spot. Rajini is left to fill the gargantuan shoes available to him, those of the god-like MGR. To replace him—no mean feat—the newcomer has to recreate the swaggering underclass machismo and mesmerising screen presence, but now repackaged to suit the needs of a disillusioned post-Emergency audience. His acting prowess or range is irrelevant to the task at hand. Rajini, much like Amitabh Bachchan up north, takes his success where he finds it: as a brooding angry young man acting out a populist revenge fantasy. And in a neat dovetailing of their parallel trajectories, Rajinikanth will cement his superstar status in 1980 with Billa, a remake of Bachchan’s megahit Don.
“Celebrity is created in the nexus between the individual’s talent and ambition, the film industry’s needs, and the fans who consume this politics of celebrity-making,” says Ravindran.

Read more HERE

25 comments:

  1. To add to my comments (above the author's name), it is still mystifying to me that people would praise Robot and hate Dabangg - the two films are very similar for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i find it funny how a person who is considered a failure in Hindi film industry , his films basically do best down south in population of 13 crores ( check collections of Robot in hindi ) can be considered Indian superstar ? its just that Media found this sudden liking for Rajni since Sivaji .

    last Indian superstar was Amitabh

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes indeed, his film may collect whopping money but how is he a pan-India superstar? He is a very influential regional superstar.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The article is just a hyperbole as after any big success.

    But there is nothing like Pan-India Star.

    BW movies only work in few Cospolitian cities down south majorly(Bangalore,HYD,Chennai etc), which in turn are only mainly seen by Hindi speaking people who have settled there for various reasons.

    Metro centric movies dont get proper release in Bihar/Adjoining UP nowadays(where Gadar,Raja Hindustani and Jaanwar did 2.5-3 cr Share), leave alone doing huge business there. KJO movies regularly do bad to average there.

    Something like Dabangg can only entice them to some degree.Raajneeti with huge regional flavour did like 2 cr Share.

    Infact Mumbai+Delhi Territories Account for 60-65% business of Hindi Movies and its pretty much uniform for all movies.

    Perhaps someone like Big B had some chance of being a Pan-India star, though thats also Anecdotal in nature.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Big B was the closest we had! In those days the angry man who played Coolie, cross dressed, danced with ghunghroo and surma, and fought all evil while still was not all good himself - this resonated with common man. The mango people were not aware of his Sherwood college schooling and elite background. Now they are and he cannot be a mass idol anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes Pardesi you are right.Big B had that.

    And i hope a day comes when Hindi Cinema again starts getting strong in the heartland and interiors(which it has been losing slowly for some years) and collections like Dabangg,Raajneeti or even Rab Ne become the norm and not the exception.

    ReplyDelete
  7. still i would say a Aamir or Srk to have more following over country than say Rajni . Rajni has amazing following but its related to a zone of country compared to say Srk or Aamir whose films are seen by much more diverse group.

    Also south films dont have ET so mostly nett=gross for them while nearly 40% of our films money is lost in gross . so Robot did do 56 crores weekend nett but Dabaang if u count gross would be much more( roughly 90 crores) . doga can correct me if i am wrong .

    ReplyDelete
  8. That is another interesting point. If most of the money came from the South then it cannot be compared to the collections of Dabangg! Makes that one and 3 Idiots seem even more mammoth in comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  9. arre logonnn...he is from India so Indian superstar....khatam khatam

    ReplyDelete
  10. You are right Neo.

    Dabanng Gross is still highest for the weekend.

    Dabangg had 65 cr Gross , Robot 62 cr.

    Dabangg got only 49 cr Nett, Robot 56 cr.(Very low Tax for Robot ~ 10-15%)

    Dabangg then got 30 cr share, Robot 42 cr.(Again very high share for Robot as its Single screen dominated).

    And its also true that Aamir,SRK have more number and diverse following and may be they are little more strong in south compared to Rajni in north.

    Hindi Robot will do 10 cr.

    A Big Hindi movie like 3 Idiots did 20 cr in south and Dabangg will do 15+ cr.

    The only thing which differentiates Rajni from other south stars is he is Big in not just his state but 5 States namely Tamil,Telugu,Kanadda,Malyalam and Mumbai to some extent and actually this is rare even down south.

    But as ending note as much as its ridiculous to say Rajni is Pan-Indian superstar same way its not always right to totally regionalise the situation, because that way even BW is just a small regional cinema of the world which infact has not even gone Pan-India yet properly.

    Yes i would also say this and that south/north star is zone based say Vijay,Biswajit or Jimmy shergill but Rajni ofcourse is different.

    Pumping Rajni out of the equation will obviously bring comparsions etc which might not show him in the brightest of the situation vis a vis number of regions following him but we all know he is special too because his these kind of strong BO collections have been a norm for some time(not Robot level) though its true that its really gone to new level(comparing to BW movies) since Chandramukhi,Sivaji and Now Robot.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Doga - when you add to the Robot vs Dabangg comparison the fact that in the first week Robot was overpriced 30-40% over normal ticket prices, the the difference between the two becomes even more striking. The number of footfalls is simply much bigger for Dabangg.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tax for BW movies has also been going down from ~ 40% in 1990's to around 25% now.

    Though even now trade sometimes uses 40% a standard.

    The New plexes have tax exempt from the Govt so they only have 15-20% Tax.

    And also Single screens had a protest in early 2000's after which Govt Reduced their tax from 55% to 45% and even lower some places, though UP-Bihar still levy huge tax on BW movies.

    Going forward things should be improving as Single screens are wiped out and Multiplexes take over them, by then overall Tax will reach ~ 20% only.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Pardesi i usually dont go into footfalls, otherwise Wanted,Veer and Dabangg will be among top 7-8 movie last 3-4 years, :)

    I only go by Money and also dont take ticket price into consideration as it also matter on the product attraction and can also sometimes offput the customer.

    Dabangg had little to no price increase compared to 3 Idiots but i would not give Dabangg any benefit on the account.

    It beat 3 Idiots on money and thats fair and square.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "It beat 3 Idiots on money and thats fair and square."

    weekend yes. first week, I am not sure from available data. I did calculations and from "Valid" data set, 3 idiots was ahead. But that is not sufficient to prove one way or other because of small difference and Dabangg might have done better business at smaller centers.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Khanabadosh Dabangg was actually not that ahead of 3 Idiots in Plexes,also any Data set you take for 3 I first week will include previews etc, which will be hard to distinguish until one just subtracts 2.75 cr straight from the first week total.

    But the flavour of the movie(Dabangg) far exceeded 3 Idiots when it came to Single Screens and interiors.

    So Obviously Dabangg was far ahead in weekend and marginally in the week though in the long run 3 Idiots will end 55+ cr ahead.

    We can see from the Share that Dabangg will have around 80 cr share from 145 cr Nett,whereas 3 Idiots got 100 cr from 203 cr, showing how much of Dabangg's share came from Single Screens.

    3 Idiots reportedly did 50 cr from Single Screens, Dabangg will do around 65+ cr Nett.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Doga - "But the flavour of the movie(Dabangg) far exceeded 3 Idiots when it came to Single Screens and interiors."
    Not in Maharastra or South. In UP and central India it was better. But in Gujarat (some),Rajasthan it was print count which was giving more collections. Will publish the results after cleaning up the XLS for feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yes Khanabadosh ,Dabangg was the most wide spread Single Screen release ever with Highest print counts in Rajasthan and CI, that was to tap into Salman's core areas, as he is most strong in the Hindi Belt.

    Aamir definitely has more following in South than Salman(except Hyderabad) and yes the first place for Dabangg to have substantial falls(~ 50%) were South Mumbai Plexes and am sure the single screens must have also followed same sequence.Though Dabangg did end up as highest grossing Hindi movie in Chennai.

    Delhi/UP,Bihar,Rajasthan,CP Berar,Nizam and CI gave the strongest Numbers for Dabangg, though Mumbai will be ahead overall due to larger number of screens.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Doga - so which Robot was released in regions like karnataka , kerala etc . from what i can get Robot did best business in TN , Andhra .

    but Robot figures does show a way for Hindi films . they need to penetrate southern centres more and they would have huge increase in gross .

    i still thin k gross is counted at 40%. tax benefits r given to new plexes but many old plexes have also lost that benefit . and i still think most count tax as 4%

    ReplyDelete
  19. Approximate Gross and Nett of BW movies(See difference in older and newer movies)

    http://www.boxofficeindia.com/showProd.php?itemCat=108&catName=QUxMIElORElB

    Robot was released in 3 languages only(Tamil,Telugu and Hindi).

    ReplyDelete
  20. Doga will Robot not face restrictions in karnataka on the no. of screens ? if yes it would be very limited release and penetration will be same as Hindi films

    ReplyDelete
  21. There is restriction in Karnataka for all movies outside.

    But Bangalore is in Karnataka, and i think they allow 22 prints in the state, which is more than enough.

    Hindi movies do their business but ofcourse Rajni being in close vicinity culturally has lots more following.

    Imagine if Rajni has following in Maharashtra(most of the Hindi Robot came from there), Karanataka is even closer.

    Prices in Bangalore plexes went off the roof for Robot and were highest in India , 500-700 or even 1500 at places.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Sorry its 25 Theatres in Karnataka.

    And ofcourse Tamil Nadu and Andhara(Telugu) must have provided bulk of the the business for Endhiran.(60-70%)

    ReplyDelete
  23. And its a newer rule implemented only few years back after the collapse of Kannada industry, hopefully will be removed after things stabalize for them.Kannada Industry is slowly improving.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree with Neo that BW movies might be able to tap in the great southern side, but do you think that there can be one movie which can appeal to both northies and Southies? I don't think even Ghajini was one such movie, it was Aamir, and amazing promotions, I think.....

    ReplyDelete
  25. Ghajini was already released 2 yrs back for them , still business it did was quite strong down south . See i think something like 3 idiots could have penetrated more if BigCinemas had tried . Hw films dub themselves in tamil ,Telugu so may be Bw should try this way for extra revenue . i know its a risk but BW needs to think of how to increase domestic collection and than think about overseas.

    ReplyDelete